friend
friendship
friendly
unfriendly
friendliness
undfi endliness

так?

But I agree with those who say that you can be happy if you are not famous. To become famous you have to work really hard. Good singers work many hours a day, and when all your life is work, you are not happy. Moreover, famous people are followed by paparazzi who always take pictures and gossip. I doubt that it will make you happy. I think that to be happy you need a good job, a loving family and good friends, and to have all that you do not need to be famous. That is why I agree with those who say that fame does not make you happy.

As we see, there are different opinions on relationship between fame and happiness. I prefer to side with those, who think that you can be happy without being famous.

*******************************
• In today’s world of technology governments have enough resources to interfere with any aspect of our lives. Even though some people claim that projects like space exploration should require the greatest attention, I still believe that the first problems people have to solve are ecological.
It is obvious that the quality of our lives depends on how healthy our environment is. There is no way our children will be healthy unless we care for nature now and make sure that the air is fresh and the water is clean. I also think that investing money in ecology projects now will save governments a lot of money in the future. Not only saving the non-renewable resources like oil and gas and using water and sun energy instead is environmentally friendly, but also cheaper in the perspective. Furthermore, by treating our planet so badly we basically destroy it. So why spend so much money on other projects if we won’t be able to realize them?...
Some people may say that nature fights back and since it does, we can assume that it can deal with the problems on its own. However, in my opinion, cataclysms are warnings, and nature is showing us how destructive it can be. Do we want to suffer from natural disasters and lose lives and money if we can simply help nature and soothe our own pain?
To sum up, I want to say that we should always solve the problems as they appear. Nature is our home, and to make our lives harmonious and happy we should first of all make sure that the environment is friendly and live in accordance with the world around us.

Мany people think that we should solve environmental problems and invest money in ecology projects, while others believe that nature doesn't need our help
to my mind, people really should invest their money in projects connected with ecology, because environmental problems is one of the most important and acute problems in the whole world. we need to improve the ecologycal situation to save our nature for the next generation,for our children. we should remember,that the cause of all ecological problems are people. we mustn't do only harm for our planet, that's why should take parts in egology programms and projects or just invest the money in it.
however, i can't even understand why other people believe, that nature is doing well by itself. may be they just don't know about such problems as exhaust fumes, endangered species, a problem of dumping rubbish and many other, which destroy our ecologycal system. or may be they hope that if people don't do anything for the environment, the situation will impove by itself, because , in their opinion, people can only spoil the nature.
but, i think, people can really save our nature by investing their money in ecology projects, because new technologies allow to make inventions, which will solve some environmental problems.
i hope, people will soon understand, that we must protect the nature and invest money in environmental projects to save our planet for us and our children .

Вот нашла на каком-то сайте...Кто про учителей может что-нибудь выложить?

Добавлено (2010-06-03, 3:58 PM)
---------------------------------------------

Добавлено (2010-06-03, 4:07 PM)
---------------------------------------------
Stas_Karpov, ЗАКОЛЕБАЛ!

если кому надо на телефон -